Quick Poll

The Republican Party is
still the Party of Reagan
completely out of touch with America
a purely obstructionist entity with no fresh ideas
now a permament minority Party
a racist organization
looking out for the little guy
looking out for the rich elites

Sponsored Links

Terror Alert Level

Terror Alert Level

Top Tags

                           

I'm Reading

The Bookshelf

Calendar

««Nov 2009»»
SMTWTFS
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930

Search

 

Mailing List

Hits This Month

Total: 54,955
since: 5 Sep 2009

Quotable Me

"I am not pro-abortion; I am against government-enforced maternity."

"If those Gitmo guys are terrorists, try 'em and fry 'em; if they're a threat, prove it. But you can't just hold 'em without a trial. It's un-American."

American Pundit Exclusives

My RSS Feeds








The European Dream: How Europe's Vision of the Future Is Quietly Eclipsing the American Dream

posted Friday, 11 February 2005
The European Dream: How Europe's Vision of the Future Is Quietly Eclipsing the American Dream

Jeremy Rifkin

Date: 19 August, 2004   —   $16.35   —   Book

product page

Rating:

Like the last book I read by Jeremy Rifkin, "The Hydrogen Economy", this one is very well written. In fact, I seriously had to stop and think for a while about once per page. But where Rifkin's musings about the future of energy were on fairly solid ground, this book feels a little mushy. Rifkin sees the European Union as a new era in human society - a transnational state whose legitimacy is based on universal human rights, quality of life, sustainable development, and globalism, rather than the current Hobbesian social contract based on private property, markets, and borders.

Rifkin obviously did a lot of thinking about what it means to be an American and who Americans believe they are - and on the whole, I think he got it right. But the premise of the book is that the idealistic principles upon which the EU Constitution is based are representative of the dreams and ideals of all Europeans, and are the future of human governance in an increasingly interconnected world. I'm not sure I buy it. I mean, if that were true, wouldn't the constitution have been ratified by now?

And Rifkin glosses over some of the big problems facing Europe today - growing racism, problems integrating immigrants, and unemployment - characterizing them as challenges to be overcome in pursuit of the dream. And that may be true; most Americans don't actually achieve the American Dream, though most of us believe in it. But that, I think, is the big difference. Rifkin himself points out the European Dream is going to have to deal not only with current societal problems, but also the deep cynicism Europeans seem to apply to every problem. While Europeans chuckle over America's naive optimism, I doubt you can even have a "Dream" without it.

Rifkin also cherry-picks numbers, stats, and polls to extol the European Dream, but not for the reason you'd think at first glance. For example, he points out that, in terms of productivity-per-hour, the French worker beats the American worker. But he doesn't mention the French worker only works a 35 hour week. Immediately you think, "Aha! Frenchie doesn't look so good when you see the big picture, does he?" But then you think about it again, and start to wonder who the real winner is. Is it the guy who busts his butt to drive a Lexus to work six days a week, or the guy who spends his afternoons eating baguettes with his buddies watching soccer at the sidewalk cafe? I'm pretty sure Rifkin used that comparison with exactly that train of thought in mind for his reader.

Buy into it or not, "The European Dream" is a fascinating compare and contrast of the American psyche with European attitudes, and it's definitely worth the read on that basis alone. And it may well be true that the EU will be better able to cope with globalization, but I'm just not convinced that Europeans have a universal dream the same way Americans do. And even if they do, I don't think it'll supersede the American Dream any time soon.




1. a reader left...
Friday, 11 February 2005 1:33 pm

Don't get hung up on the dream. In practice, today, the American dream consists of making a lot of money. Rifkin has a point here. Europeans are concerned more with quality of life.

More important, U.S. seeks military solutions and Europeans prefer diplomatic solutions.

Paul Siegel


2. American Pundit left...
Friday, 11 February 2005 7:41 pm

Paul, you're right about the differences, of course. And maybe I shouldn't get "hung up on the dream" - all I can say is, Rifkin started lt. :)

But I just don't see the European Dream as it exists today being more compelling than the American Dream.

A big factor in making it more compelling for me will be how well the Iran negotiations work out. If Europe can finesse an agreement that prevents Iran from building a nuke - and make them stick to it - the ideals become practical and the dream begins to become a reality.

Europe has a long, shared history of conflict and loss. It's no surprise the ideals the EU Constitution espouses are beginning to take root there. When those ideals begin to become universal among all nations of the world, like the American Dream was (and still is, mostly), then I'll believe it's a dream and not just a daydream of the constitution's framers.

Like I said, if all of Europe deeply believed in the European Dream, why haven't they ratified the constitution yet?

Visit me @ http://americanpundit.blog-city.com/


3. Vandeervecken left...
Sunday, 13 February 2005 9:16 pm

I do get tired of the myth of the peaceful European. Hello. Two world wars last century Hundreds of millions killed. The Yugoslavian succession genocides. Northern Ireland. Belgians in the Congo. English, French, Spanish, Portuguese, German, Dutch and Belgian imperialism. Genocide on grand scales. The Falklands war. The Brigade Rossie, Baader-Meinhof, ETA, IRA, UDF etc.

Europe has collectively committed more acts of aggression and genocide then the rest of the world squared and yet lecture us on being aggressive? This is about as logical as having Xavier Hollander lecturing Madonna on chastity.

Visit me @ http://vandeervecken.blog-city.com