Quick Poll

The Republican Party is
still the Party of Reagan
completely out of touch with America
a purely obstructionist entity with no fresh ideas
now a permament minority Party
a racist organization
looking out for the little guy
looking out for the rich elites

Sponsored Links

Terror Alert Level

Terror Alert Level

Top Tags

                           

I'm Reading

The Bookshelf

Calendar

««Nov 2009»»
SMTWTFS
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930

Search

 

Mailing List

Hits This Month

Total: 55,251
since: 5 Sep 2009

Quotable Me

"I am not pro-abortion; I am against government-enforced maternity."

"If those Gitmo guys are terrorists, try 'em and fry 'em; if they're a threat, prove it. But you can't just hold 'em without a trial. It's un-American."

American Pundit Exclusives

My RSS Feeds








Rice On Iraq

posted Thursday, 20 October 2005

I caught Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's testimony to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee yesterday. The one good thing I heard was a plan to deploy Afghanistan-style Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRTs) to Iraq. After two and a half years of bumbling, it's way past time for a real plan.

The challenge, of course, is to hold Iraq together until the PRTs can gain traction rebuilding infrastructure and building trust in the communities in which they work. It'll be hard enough to get the civilian component into Iraq under current conditions, and impossible if the Sunnis decide the Shiites and Kurds will never allow them to participate in Iraq's political process (the Shiite attempt to change the referendum rules isn't very encouraging), and full-scale civil war breaks out.

If President Bush is serious about using PRTs to secure Iraq, I expect to see a full-scale diplomatic blitz to secure commitments from UN humanitarian agencies, the international community, and NGOs like Medecins Sans Frontieres to provide doctors, police, judges, sewer workers, teachers, firemen -- everything needed to reseed a community after a catastrophic breakdown. And all under the protection of lots of well-armed, well-trained troops, preferably with a more "international flavor".

But you'll have to pardon me if I'm skeptical about President Bush's commitment to something like that. It's a major undertaking, and a major shift from the current strategy (whatever that is). It's going to take a lot of work -- especially diplomatic work -- and I don't think President Bush can, or even wants, to put in the effort.

But I hope he does, because Senator Lugar is right, "Permanent instability or civil war in Iraq could set back American interests in the Middle East for a generation -- increasing anti-Americanism, multiplying the threats from tyrants and terrorists and reducing our credibility."